Trade conflicts continue to escalate across major economies, creating undeniable challenges for businesses attempting to manage their global tax positions and transfer pricing arrangements.
The latest round of aggressive tariff policies has sent shockwaves through international commerce, with US duties of 25% on Canadian and Mexican imports alongside steep charges on Chinese goods now reaching an extraordinary 104% as of the time of writing.
The financial impact proves substantial: PwC calculates these measures could generate approximately $132 billion in additional tariffs on Mexican goods and $73 billion on Canadian products yearly.
For Chinese goods, that could mean $418 billion in extra costs. For companies with integrated cross-border operations, these sudden cost increases require immediate attention to tax structures and pricing strategies.
The only certainty in the current global trade environment appears to be uncertainty itself. For the foreseeable future, businesses must adapt to rapidly changing rules while maintaining tax compliance across multiple jurisdictions.
This volatility creates tax complications for businesses with international supply chains, yet also opens strategic options for those based in stable locations. Singapore – with its established stability during previous trade disruptions, broad treaty networks, and central position within ASEAN’s growing economy – provides a compelling option for businesses seeking protection from current trade turbulence.
This article analyses how recent tariff changes affect global tax and transfer pricing situations, outlines practical approaches for businesses facing these challenges, and explains why Singapore’s distinct qualities make it an excellent base for companies seeking stability during trade uncertainty.
Related Read: Opportunities in Adversity: Why is Singapore a Shelter Against Global Trade Uncertainty?
Transfer Pricing Challenges During Tariff Turmoil
Transfer pricing – the practice of pricing transactions between related companies across national borders – faces particular strain during periods of tariff volatility. With a minimum of 10% tariffs now affecting major trade routes, transfer pricing experts warn that many businesses will see costs exceeding their entire profit margins.
The Five P’s Approach
Transfer pricing expert Matthew Wall points to what he calls “the five P’s” as a framework for businesses facing tariff-induced pressure:
Planning: Companies need both short and long-range strategies during tariff upheaval. Management teams will play a key role in strategizing the future course of action and prepare for uncertainties.
Procurement: With input materials now subject to various tariff rates, sourcing teams must identify alternative suppliers to reduce tariff impacts. Alternative sources for procurement of input materials may be explored from countries with more favourable tariff treatment or trade agreement benefits.
Production: Manufacturing strategies require reassessment based on changing market access. Production teams should evaluate whether current capacity levels remain appropriate under new tariff conditions. This might mean adjusting production schedules before considering staff reductions.
Pricing: Client pricing policies need flexibility to handle tariff-driven cost increases. Price elasticity may be tested to determine how much of the tariff cost a business can pass to consumers without significantly affecting sales volume.
Profits: The end goal focuses on profit preservation and cash flow management during economic stress. We foresee that financing arrangements will become particularly critical as lenders apply stricter criteria due to increased risk perception in tariff-affected industries.
Documentation Pressures
Our experience at InCorp shows that tax authorities significantly increase scrutiny of transfer pricing during non-routine situations, i.e., tariff disruption and use sophisticated technology to identify audit targets.
Robust back-up transfer pricing documentation becomes essential in this environment, particularly for regulatory filings. These documents track related-party transactions, providing tax authorities with comprehensive visibility into global supply chains. At InCorp, we help clients develop strong documentation practices that withstand this enhanced scrutiny.
Arm’s Length Principle Complications
Perhaps most challenging, tariffs create doubt about what actually constitutes an “arm’s length” transaction. When unforeseen 25% (for example) cost increases appear, how would independent businesses respond? This question affects:
- Risk allocation between related parties
- Profit split arrangements
- Customs valuation practices
- Comparability analyses
Given the unprecedented nature of these global tariffs, the absence of historical market data on arm’s length responses to such dramatic tariff increases makes defending transfer pricing positions particularly difficult. Companies must balance competing priorities from tax and customs authorities that may have opposing interests regarding declared values.
Related Read: Transfer Pricing Documentation in Singapore: Tax Facts to Know
Supply Chain Disruptions and Restructuring
The current tariff situation forces companies to reconsider supply chain structures built over decades of globalisation. These deeply integrated networks – once designed for cost efficiency – now face fundamental challenges as tariff barriers rise.
Attempting to Unwind Global Integration
For forty years, businesses created intricate cross-border operations optimised for a low-tariff world. During this period of globalisation, business activities were strategically separated across countries to minimise duplication, reduce costs, and maximise profits.
The current US administration explicitly aims to reverse this trend. The United States administration has stated that its tariff strategy intends to bring more economic activity (especially manufacturing) back to the US.
As the market stands, however, integrated, cross-border supply chains will resist that kind of reorganisation. The process resembles trying to reconstruct a complex system after it has been broken apart – an enormously challenging undertaking.
Cost Implications of Restructuring
Supply chain restructuring carries substantial costs beyond the tariffs themselves:
- Capital investment in new facilities
- Personnel training in alternative locations
- Regulatory compliance with different jurisdictions
- Quality control across new suppliers
- Tax registration in additional countries
These expenses make rapid shifts impractical, even when tariff costs appear prohibitive. Companies often find themselves temporarily absorbing tariff expenses while gradually adjusting operations – a situation that squeezes margins and complicates tax planning.
Customs Valuation Conflicts
The relationship between customs valuation and transfer pricing creates particular difficulties during restructuring. As related parties adjust prices to reflect new tariff realities, they must balance competing pressures:
| Aspect | Transfer Pricing | Customs |
|---|---|---|
| Importer administering agency | Tax authorities often favour lower transfer prices on imports to increase taxable income domestically | Customs authorities typically prefer higher declared values to maximise tariff collection |
| Methodology approach | Flexible methods to reflect arm’s length prices | Strict hierarchy of methods with transaction value preferred |
This tension places businesses in a difficult position when restructuring. Moving operations to minimise tariff impact can trigger transfer pricing adjustments that customs authorities may question.
Risk Allocation Challenges
Supply chain adjustments also affect how risk is allocated among the group entities. Contract terms generally specify which entity will bear tariff risk, but tariff impositions, adjustments, and withdrawals can happen abruptly and unexpectedly.
Many companies now find their contractual risk allocations inadequate for current conditions. While agreements might identify the importer of record, they may not have anticipated such tariff levels or planned for who should absorb such costs.
Related Read: Going Global: How Does the Double Tax Deduction for Internationalisation Help?
Singapore’s Strategic Advantages During Trade Uncertainty
As tariff conflicts continue to cause instability, Singapore offers a famously secure base for companies looking for tax and operational stability. The city-state provides multiple tangible benefits that protect businesses during global trade volatility.
Economic Recovery Track Record
Singapore shows exceptional economic performance during trade disruptions. Past results demonstrate its ability to recover quickly from external economic pressures. According to data from Macrotrends:
Asian Financial Crisis: After a -2.19% GDP drop in 1998, Singapore achieved 5.72% growth by 1999 and 9.04% by 2000.
Global Financial Crisis: The 2008-2009 period slowed growth to just 0.13%, yet the economy rebounded with 14.52% growth in 2010 – outpacing most global economies.
Recent Trade Conflicts: During 2018-2020 US-China tensions, Singapore maintained positive growth until COVID-19 caused a -3.87% decline, but growth returned dramatically at 9.69% by 2021.
This consistent pattern shows Singapore’s ability to absorb economic shocks and recover quickly – a valuable asset during trade disputes.
Central Market Position
Singapore acts as a geographical, economic, and cultural bridge between East and West, providing direct access to Southeast Asian markets. This position allows companies to reach major portions of global GDP while sidestepping geopolitical obstacles.
This position helps buffer Singapore from external trade pressures, and this geographic benefit grows more valuable when tariffs disrupt standard export channels.
Trade Agreement Coverage
During tariff disputes, Singapore’s extensive trade agreement network creates alternative market pathways. Singapore can use shifts in production and supply chains to attract investment and strengthen its position in reconfigured trade flows.
Singapore participates in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and other major trade pacts, securing preferential access to key markets despite rising protectionism elsewhere.
Regulatory Predictability
Singapore provides consistent regulations when other countries experience policy upheaval. This stability carries through to tax practices, with Singapore offering:
- Clear source-based tax systems
- Broad tax treaty connections
- Consistent corporate rates
- Transparent ruling procedures
- Well-established transfer pricing rules
The strong banking system and absence of currency controls add financial security when monetary policies elsewhere create instability.
ASEAN Market Access
Singapore provides entry to ASEAN – set to become the fourth-largest economy worldwide by 2030. This economic zone offers significant growth based on:
- Population expansion in nearby countries
- Growing consumer spending power
- Regional trade connections through the ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement (ATIGA)
- Supply networks within Southeast Asia
- Digital economy growth
For businesses seeking alternatives to tariff-affected markets, ASEAN presents substantial opportunities through Singapore’s business networks.
Related Read: Is Singapore a Tax Haven? Unveiling the Truth Behind Its Tax System and Financial Hub Status
Practical Transfer Pricing Solutions for Businesses
Current tariff conflicts demand specific approaches to transfer pricing that satisfy tax rules, customs requirements, and business needs. Companies require concrete tactics to tackle these issues.
Contract Review Priorities
A complete assessment of existing company agreements creates the basis for effective tariff responses:
Tariff Risk Provisions: Check how current contracts distribute tariff costs between parties. Many pre-conflict agreements lack suitable terms for major tariff increases.
Price Adjustment Rules: Add formal sections outlining how prices change when tariffs shift significantly. These should detail triggers, calculation methods, and timing.
Import Responsibility: Clearly state which company entity acts as the official importer and pays initial tariff costs. This affects both cash management and final cost distribution.
Evidence Standards: Update terms regarding proof needed for price changes, especially for customs purposes where post-import adjustments face strict rules.
New Benchmarking Methods
The usual way to defend transfer prices – using similar deals between unrelated companies – becomes difficult during trade conflicts. Companies should:
Widen Geographic Scope: Analyse publicly available financial data from similar companies operating in different regions. This helps identify how market participants’ overall profitability changes in response to tariffs, even without direct access to their internal pricing strategies.
Break Down Results: Separate financial data to isolate tariff effects where possible, allowing more exact comparisons.
Use Multiple Years: While tax officials often want yearly analysis, data across several years may offer more stable reference points during tariff volatility. Prepare clear reasons for this method if questioned.
Market Difference Calculations: Apply comparability adjustments for tariff variations between markets when comparing transactions or company results.
Tax and Customs Coordination
The clash between customs and tax needs requires careful planning:
Unified Value Approach: Create a single method for transfer pricing that works for both tax and customs officials, cutting the risk of contradictory positions.
Preapproval Options (Advance Rulings): While we acknowledge this might not always be possible, endeavour to get advance confirmation from tax or customs authorities for major pricing changes due to tariffs.
Proof Collection: Build strong evidence of market conditions to justify price adjustments. Include market studies, outside price data, and industry standards.
Timeline Planning: Address the gap between customs officials (who check duties at import) and tax authorities (who may review prices much later). This time difference requires advance planning to maintain consistent positions.
Where to Next With InCorp
Current tariff conflicts create tax issues that demand immediate attention. With duties reaching 104% and adding potential costs of $418 billion on Chinese imports alone, companies face urgent questions about pricing strategies, supply arrangements, and tax compliance across multiple countries.
These tax considerations need expert knowledge beyond what many company teams can offer, especially when managing opposing priorities from tax officials and customs authorities. As pricing examinations become more targeted through advanced audit systems, documentation standards grow increasingly strict.
InCorp’s global tax team combines extensive pricing expertise with real experience helping businesses protect profits during trade instability. Our specialists create custom solutions that maintain tax compliance while adapting to changing tariff conditions, through contract updates, comparison adjustments, or strategic supply modifications.
Contact InCorp today to learn how our tax and pricing services can help your business build strength during tariff uncertainty. We will address the complex regulatory questions while you concentrate on the essentials—sustaining business growth and profits in challenging conditions.
FAQs about Global Transfer Pricing and Tax
How do recent tariff increases affect pricing between company affiliates?
- Tariff increases of 10-104% strain pricing between related companies by potentially exceeding profit margins. They complicate market comparisons, require risk redistribution, and force businesses to balance tax and customs requirements with limited historical data on how independent companies would respond to such dramatic cost increases.
Why does Singapore offer benefits during trade disputes?
- Singapore provides economic stability (quick crisis recovery), strategic location between East and West, extensive trade agreements, regulatory consistency, and access to ASEAN markets – projected to become the world's fourth-largest economy by 2030.
How should companies update their pricing documentation during tariff disputes?
- Companies should revise contract risk sections, add price adjustment rules, clarify tariff payment responsibilities, set evidence standards, use wider benchmarking approaches, analyse multi-year data, and create unified methods satisfying both tax and customs authorities.
Find out how our experts can help with your transfer pricing and tax concerns!
About the Author
